Piore and Schrank, Root-Cause Regulation [Escaping Proper Economic Analysis]

Just out from Harvard U. Press, Piore and Schrank provide a nuanced account of the modern labor economy, and how the systemic economic account misses important phenomena. Namely, there is real flexibility and choice in our economic relationships, and that choice allows for very different outcomes. You can read the Introduction on amazon.com.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Promotion and Tenure, some probabilities

Empirically, Marginal tenure cases lead to marginal careers, or disappointing ones. Probability is above 95%, maybe 98%. They take  much  longer than other cases to be promoted to full, if they are so promoted at all. Rarely does a tenure turndown then have a distinguished scholarly career. Surely there is a stigma to being turned down, but that seems not to be be the issue. Perhaps 1-2% of turndowns have distinguished subsequent careers.  Slow progress from associate to full is only rarely accompanied with the production of a major work when they come up for promotion. Probability is 5% at most. In general, we make many more mistaken positive decisions than mistaken negative ones, the ratio being perhaps 10:1. The basic principle is that being a faculty member of a university that is on the rise is a rare opportunity. Mistaken appointments and promotions preclude our appointing more talented scholars. And there is a agglomeration effect, more exc...
Read more
Seymour Cray was the premier supercomputer designer.  His firm was Cray Research, after he left CDC. John Rollwagen, his CEO,...      The real message was something I always told our people. Namely that we had exclusive access to Seymour's disruptive ability to create uniquely powerful computers from quite common elements. And that we, in turn, uniquely organized ourselves to build and sell as many of those machines as possible in competition with some of the largest companies on the planet.      We succeeded by embracing Seymour's disruptive talent and then singlemindedly organizing around it. I always reminded the Crayons that our success came from that total commitment to supercomputers and if there came a time when we became the disrupted rather than the disrupters, it would be time to move on with happy memories and great resumes.
Read more

The Road To Hell, and The Weather Along the Way

Would we be better off were we to swear off apocalyptic thinking? I have spent much of my research career thinking about  apocalyptic possibilities .  Each possibility has passed out of consideration , although the arguments have merit, and even the evidence is persuasive. The big question is when to constrain behavior, and if there is ever a time  when it is "too late" to act . Also, we are rather  weak at predicting technological developments  compared to sketching apocalypses, so the apocalypse tends to have a better argument than a more wait-and-see policy, or perhaps a deliberate research effort to develop those technologies (which may be a matter of societal arrangements rather than a material discovery). More generally,  t he prospect of apocalypse is used to  justify policies  and behavior that would otherwise seem not so prudent. The possibility of doom, if taken as a matter of  decision analysis , is fraught with uncer...
Read more